Key Concepts in Environmental Planning
Environmental PLANNING
Key Concepts in
environmental planning
QUESTIONS
|
TOOLS
|
Who are they?
|
demographic
analysis
|
What do they do?
|
economic
analysis
|
Where do these activities
occur?
|
land use
analysis
|
How are human activities
connected spatially?"
|
transportation
analysis
|
What is Planning?
the act or process of making or carrying out plans
specifically: the establishment of goals, policies, and
procedures for a social or economic unit
A basic management function involving formulation of one or more
detailed plans to achieve optimum balance of needs or demands with the
available resources. The planning process
1. identifies the
goals or objectives to be achieved,
2. formulates
strategies to achieve them,
3. arranges or
creates the means required, and
4. implements,
directs, and monitors all steps in their proper sequence
Legal Definition of Environmental Planning
According to REPUBLIC ACT No. 10587, " Environmental
Planning Act of 2013,"
Environmental planning is defined as urban
and regional planning, city planning, town and country planning, and/or human
settlements planning, refers to the multi-disciplinary art and science of
analyzing, specifying, clarifying, harmonizing, managing and regulating the use
and development of land and water resources, in relation to their environs, for
the development of sustainable communities and ecosystems. (Sec. 4 (a) of R.A.
10587)
Other definition:
“refers to activities connected with the management and development of
land, as well as the preservation, conservation and management of the human
environment”
- Presidential
Decree No. 1308, March 2, 1978
Objective is to liberate communities from urban blight and congestion
and promote ecological balance
- PD 933,
series of 1976, Decree Creating the Human Settlements Commission, later HSRC,
later HLURB
1. A framework for growth -
Thriving cities have a vision and follow it through with a framework to develop
in an orderly manner. A framework is not about centralized command and control
but a way to anticipate needs, coordinate efforts, and draw a path to a horizon
that is collectively held. Major efforts to enhance livability, prosperity and
equity have taken place in a number of well-known cities. Such transformational
impact is not a product of spontaneity, instead of constructive planning.
2. A planned city is a well-prepared
city - Anticipating the future allows us to be better prepared today. By
staying ahead of challenges, city leaders are ready to see opportunities and
manage risks from a vantage point. With reliable information on the current
situation, they will be able to make connections between the long-term vision and
short-term actions. On the other hand, cities that don’t actively plan for
their future will likely be left behind.
3. Planning improves impact. -
Local leaders are elected and appointed to deliver improvement. Given the
magnitude of the challenges cities face, it is unlikely that all desired
improvements will happen at once. Successful cities build momentum by
undertaking priority projects that are aligned with the vision. Planning
identifies pressing issues and available resources and makes sure that
initiatives are not redundant or going in different directions.
4. An appropriate Urban form is
very important - Housing, employment, accessibility and safety are key
concerns for urban dwellers. These topics are strongly correlated to urban form.
The right policies on density, land use, public space and the layout of
infrastructure and services can make a difference in delivering quality of life
at the right price point. Designing a spatial pattern that addresses citizens’
concerns is a means for delivering a better city.
5. Urban planning positively
impacts urban economy - Making sure there are plenty of jobs in a city is a
priority for local leaders. Cities compete to attract investment with a view to
generating economic activity. Planning coordinates the spatial location and
distribution of economic activity and facilitates value capture from public
investment and the transformation of rural to urban land.
6. A collectively held plan allows
cities to build lasting relationships - City leaders that are able to see
opportunity in urbanization would need to engage all possible contributions
toward capturing it. A collectively held framework gives local leaders a road
map to reach out to citizens, energize departments and mobilize partners so
that they become engaged in realizing the vision.
7. A broader territorial
perspective helps cities attain economies of scale - Cities do not operate
in vacuums. Their footprint is associated with a surrounding region with which
they share resources and opportunities. Rather than just looking within
municipal boundaries, cities that plan together can make a competitive
advantage out of cross-municipal coordination. In addition to spatial
efficiencies, this would allow them to draw on economies of scale to boost
their negotiation power.
8. Continuity generates
credibility - Successful cities have ensured continuity of plans through
political cycles, realizing that a stable road map would make them more
credible. Investment is a long term endeavour that benefits from predictable
conditions. Spatial planning is an asset to reduce uncertainties and thus its
continuity contributes to the creation of transparent opportunities for an
engaged society.
9. Anticipating is more cost
effective than reacting to problems - Local leaders have the opportunity of
driving constructive change if they move away from laissez faire. Cities that
plan in sufficient scale would be in a position of anticipating rather than
reacting, hence being able to tackle the root of the problem. Unplanned spatial
patterns are inefficient and require more resources to maintain, and the high
cost of bad or no decisions is likely to make them irreversible.
10. A framework gives consistency to messages -
Communication is a key asset for cities, but the opportunity to connect and
convey a city’s advantages can be undermined by empty or
contradictory messages. Momentum and support are increased when the local
leader can demonstrate substantive, even if incremental, progress that is
consistent with the collective vision and framework for action.
Definition of Town Planning
What is planning? A range of views and definitions A fellow of the UK
Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI), Kelvin MacDonald (2005, p. 25).
MacDonald offered two definitions: [Informally, a planner is a]
post-modernist, moderator, politician, rationalist, advocate, realist,
economist, critic, risk-taker, developer, healer, geographer, sage, critical
thinker, environmentalist, urbanist, manager, technocrat, strategist,
statistician, negotiator, economist, ruralist, deconstructionist,
internationalist, administrator… [More formally, planning concerns] the better
use of land, shaping space, community and safety, improving the quality of the
environment, sustainable development, encouraging growth in the economy,
housing, improving the historic environment, the best use of resources and
quality. (p. 25)
Planning is the act of researching, analysing,
anticipating and influencing change in our society. In urban areas planners
guide and manage the way suburbs and regions develop, making sure that they are
good places in which to live, work and play. Planners are involved in making
decisions about land use proposals and other types of developments. In making
decisions, planners have to balance the needs of communities and the
environment.
What is town (and country) planning?
- Town and
country planning is the process of making decisions on the development and
use of land. It is a tool for guiding and facilitating development and
regeneration in a way that also preserves the best features of our
environment
- “the
determining and drawing up plans for the future physical arrangement and
condition of a community or the comprehensive planning of the physical and
social development of a town.”
- “the
physical, social and economic planning of an urban environment (such as a
town)”
Some Shifts in Modern Planning
- Before,
Product-Oriented; now Process-Oriented. Planning process is as
important as planning output.
- Before,
All-Inclusive; now Strategic
- Before,
Compartmental due to administrative boundaries; now Integrated
(Trans-border)
- Before,
“Agency-led”; now “Community-Based”
- Before,
“Top-Down”; now “Bottom-Up”
- Before,
Open Participation; now Focused Participation
Attributes of Planning Process
- SCIENCE
AND ART – requires quantifiable tools as well as subjective
creativity
- MULTI-DISCIPLINARY
Requires the expertise of various discipline economics; engineering;
sociology; architecture; law; geography etc.
- COMPREHENSIVE:
Covers all aspects of man/women and his/her environment; physical, social,
economics, political administration and the natural environment.
Participatory
- DYNAMIC:
Changes overtime, technological change; cultural norms and traditions; not
static; responsive to new demands and needs of people.
- CONTINUOUS
/ ITERATIVE: Plan is prepared, approved, implemented; reviewed and
evaluated; replan again based on new demands of the time.
- PARTICIPATORY:
values the engagement of MULTI-SECTORAL stakeholders.
- CYCLIC /
SPIRAL: Unending process; Always goes back to where it started; Were the
problems solved? Goals and objectives attained? At what level of
satisfaction?
- TIME
BOUND: Plan must have a time perspective; short, medium, long range; Basis
for plan review and assessment.:
References:
EnP. M. Pulido, (N.D.) " Enhancing Capacities of Environmental
Planners."
https://www.planning.org.au/documents/item/2115
http://www.urbangateway.org/content/news/top-ten-reasons-why-cities-need-urban-planning
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/planning
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/planning.html
https://www.productivity.govt.nz/sites/default/files/urban-planning-final-report-chapter-03.pdf
http://townplanninglectures.blogspot.com/2009/01/definitions-of-town-planning.html
No comments:
Post a Comment